Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Australian Tachinidae Prosena?
|
|
Graeme Cocks |
Posted on 22-05-2013 23:13
|
Member Location: Townsville, Australia Posts: 3083 Joined: 09.09.08 |
Could this be a Prosena sp.? Malaise trap. Townsville, Queensland. Graeme Cocks attached the following image: [34.78Kb] |
Zeegers |
Posted on 23-05-2013 13:06
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18518 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Based on the long proboscis, I assume. Otherwise, it looks more like a Leskiini or Bithia. At our side of the planet, Aphria has a similar proboscis. Theo |
|
|
Graeme Cocks |
Posted on 23-05-2013 21:39
|
Member Location: Townsville, Australia Posts: 3083 Joined: 09.09.08 |
Thanks Theo. There are no Bithia here, so will leave it as Prosena. |
ChrisR |
Posted on 24-05-2013 12:19
|
Administrator Location: Reading, England Posts: 7699 Joined: 12.07.04 |
Does it have a plumose arista and central facial ridge?
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London. |
Zeegers |
Posted on 24-05-2013 15:23
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18518 Joined: 21.07.04 |
So, I took the Herculean task upon me to actually pick up a relevant book (Crosskey 1973). In all Prosenini, the excavation of syntergite 1&@ reaching the apical margin of that segment. Here, it does not. THere should be 3 pair of apical marginal bristles, here 2 pair. In Prosena, you'd have 1 post IA, here there seem to be 3 but surely 2. So Prosena, it cannot be. If you follow my guess and suppose Leskiini, it runs pretty nice to Sipholeskia. Only one species from Queensland known: Sipholeskia certima. Originally described in Demoticus, next of kind to Bithia. It seems this all makes sense. Theo |
|
|
ChrisR |
Posted on 24-05-2013 18:06
|
Administrator Location: Reading, England Posts: 7699 Joined: 12.07.04 |
Hmm, yes it fits Leskiini better for me - nice detective work
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London. |
Graeme Cocks |
Posted on 25-05-2013 02:53
|
Member Location: Townsville, Australia Posts: 3083 Joined: 09.09.08 |
Theo, do I read 2 for @? Many thanks for your assistance. Cheers, Graeme |
Graeme Cocks |
Posted on 25-05-2013 02:58
|
Member Location: Townsville, Australia Posts: 3083 Joined: 09.09.08 |
I keep running into problems with my requests in that I don't have the flies on hand. They are stored at BOLD. So I've resurrected the malaise trap in the hope I can collect them again. |
Zeegers |
Posted on 27-05-2013 08:51
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18518 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Yes, '@' read '2'. Theo |
|
|
Jaakko |
Posted on 28-05-2013 11:06
|
Member Location: Joensuu, Finland Posts: 479 Joined: 04.08.08 |
Hi Greame If you have the DNA barcodes, use the identification engine in BOLD. Prosena siberita is in the database as well as several Leskiini. Could give you a rough direction where to look at! Cheers, Jaakko |
|
|
Graeme Cocks |
Posted on 30-05-2013 20:41
|
Member Location: Townsville, Australia Posts: 3083 Joined: 09.09.08 |
Unfortunately the DNA failed in this particular species. |
John Carr |
Posted on 16-10-2015 02:20
|
Member Location: Massachusetts, USA Posts: 9839 Joined: 22.10.10 |
Sipholeskia is now considered a synonym of Leskia. Wood's 1987 key to North American Tachinidae synonymized many of Townsend's monotypic genera. The type of Leskia is from Europe and the type of Sipholeskia is from California. Possibly your fly ought to be in a different genus, but probably not in a revived Sipholeskia. |
Graeme Cocks |
Posted on 16-10-2015 19:41
|
Member Location: Townsville, Australia Posts: 3083 Joined: 09.09.08 |
Thanks John |
Jump to Forum: |