Posted by BubikolRamios on 22-04-2014 22:23
#3
The other day in this thread:
http://www.dipter...d_id=60021
Ochlerotatus has been declared as having pale rings on legs. I see no such thing here ?
Link to mentioned specimen with pale rings:
http://agrozoo.ne...c297b1ba49
Also, I thik genitalia looks a bit different.
?
Edited by BubikolRamios on 22-04-2014 22:24
Posted by Tony Irwin on 22-04-2014 23:34
#4
BubikolRamios wrote:
The other day in this thread:
http://www.dipter...d_id=60021
Ochlerotatus has been declared as having pale rings on legs. I see no such thing here ?
No. What I said was that
Culex pipiens did
not have pale rings (unlike your specimen of
Ochlerotatus cf.
annulipes which did). Some
Ochlerotatus have pale rings on the legs, some do not. This specimen is one of the species without pale rings, and the genitalia do look different, as it is a different species, but I cannot tell from these photos which one it is. :)
Posted by BubikolRamios on 25-04-2014 02:43
#5
Thanks. Seems I'm not getting any mails from diptera info these days.
I do see 'Stop tracking this thread' in this post.